Lukashenko says he may quit as president
Belarus hits EU with tit-for-tat sanctions
Belarusian police introduce colour-coded torture system for detained protesters
Kremlin publicly condemns Belarusian police brutality in hint of growing frustration with Lukashenko
Russian services PMI rises to 48.2, but remains underwater as recovery continues to slow
Russia to start mass vaccinations on December 7
Azerbaijan’s Aliyev calls on Armenia, Russia, Turkey and Iran to assist in creating Nakhchivan land corridor
FPRI BMB Russia: Sberbank releases a three-year transformation strategy to e-commerce concern
Ukraine’s banking sector continues recovery, but profits still lagging last year
Ukraine’s real wages up over 10% in October but have been stagnant in dollar terms for almost a year
FPRI BMB Ukraine: Public has confused opinions on resolving the Donbas conflict
Western Balkans plus Ukraine subsidised coal with over €900mn in 2018-2019
Estonian parcel robot firm Cleveron eyes €30mn state loan
Estonia’s chief auditor says €1bn in state COVID-19 loans issued haphazardly
Economic sentiment in CEE falls in November as recovery momentum splutters
Estonian animation studio Imepilt to hold IPO
Brighter days ahead: The economic bounce back in 2021
Central, Southeast Europe stock markets jump in anticipation of COVID-free future
VISEGRAD BLOG: An easing of trade tensions but still an uncertain situation for export-oriented Central Europe
Hungary's PM risks isolation as Poland mulls dropping EU budget veto
Poland ready to back down from veto of EU budget
Hungary's ruling party in damage control mode after MEP sex scandal bombshell
Poland’s PMI remains stuck just above the improvement line at 50.8 in November
Czech companies dominate this year’s Deloitte Technology Fast 50 CE
Coronacrisis to get worse before it gets better forecasts wiiw
EU diplomats say no chance of Bulgaria removing veto for Skopje to start EU accession talks
IMF says downside risks to Albanian economy are increasing
EU ministers fail to agree on launch of accession talks with Albania and North Macedonia
Western Balkans commit to green agenda and regional common market at Sofia summit
Bosnia’s opposition ousts nationalist parties in major cities
Bosnia’s main ethnic parties fight to hold onto power in local elections
Southeast Europe’s EU members to get biggest boost from next budget and recovery funds
Bulgaria imposes 3-week lockdown to slow down COVID-19 spread
CEE politicians highlight trade and security ties as they congratulate Biden
Breakaway Transnistria fully under Sheriff’s control as Obnovlenie party sweeps board in parliament election
Moldova’s presidential election is over, now the battle for the parliament begins
Moldova’s foreign policy reset
Russian establishment quick to congratulate Moldova's new president-elect
Rising COVID-19 cases put intense pressure on CEE healthcare systems
MEPs urge European Commission to act against Hungarian media financing in North Macedonia and Slovenia
North Macedonia mulls decriminalising cannabis to boost tourism
Retail surpass pre-crisis peak as Romanians shop instead of holiday
Romania’s stability election
Romanian venture capital firm Catalyst launches new €40mn-50mn fund for TMT
The state is back in business
Slovenian PM Jansa stands alongside Hungary and Poland in EU rule of law row
BEYOND THE BOSPORUS: Turkish number crunchers deliver November inflation surprise of 14%
Erdogan needs to go says analyst assessing Turkey’s economic collapse
Ukraine strikes deal with Turkey to produce killer drones instrumental in Karabakh conflict
In Karabakh deal, as many questions as answers
Protesters flood Yerevan demanding Armenia’s “traitor” PM quit over Nagorno-Karabakh surrender
Who emerge as the real winners from the bloody Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?
Below average 2020 wine production destined for volatile and uncertain global market
Iran calls on Saudis to limit $67bn defence spending to Tehran’s $10bn
Iranian prosecutors pledge to pursue Trump for Soleimani killing even after he leaves White House
No reaction from Kazakh elites as bombshell FT report says Nazarbayev’s son in law siphoned millions from pipeline scheme
UK court freezes $5bn in assets connected to fugitive Kazakh banker Ablyazov
Attack of the Debt Tsunami: global debt soars to a new all-time high
Kyrgyzstan's proposed new constitution provokes widespread revulsion
Kyrgyzstan's China debt: Between crowdfunding and austerity
CFC joins RWC in assessing KAZ Minerals buyout offer as under-valuation
China business briefing: Not happy with Kyrgyzstan
Mongolian coal exports to China paralysed as Beijing demands virus testing of truck drivers
Mongolia fears economic damage as country faces up to its first local transmissions of coronavirus
Mongolia in lockdown after suffering first local coronavirus transmissions
Mongolia’s wrestling culture: From the grasslands to the cage
No surprises in Tajikistan as Rahmon retains presidency with 91% of vote
A Tajikistan poised on verge of economic calamity set for vote
Tajikistan revives on-off dispute with Iran
Turkmenistan: The dammed united
Turkmenistan: Everybody yurts, sometimes
Dirty money investigation reviews identified payments worth $1.4bn linked to Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan unveils extensive privatisation programme
Download the pdf version
On October 13, on either side of the Tatras mountains, Central Europe’s “illiberal democrats” faced their latest litmus tests.
In Poland, voters decided whether to support the Law and Justice Party (PiS) and give it a second term in government, following a politically turbulent four years in which it embarked on an ambitious project to remould the country, its legal system, its media landscape, its political economy and, above all, its society.
In Hungary, where Viktor Orban’s Fidesz party has conducted constitutional reconstruction works for nearly a decade, local elections were held.
These were bitterly fought contests. Islands of liberalism emerged across Hungary, with 10 of its 23 major cities rejecting Fidesz, including Budapest, which “did an Istanbul,” and handed the mayors office to the opposition. Yet in Poland, PiS succeeded in retaining its historic absolute majority in parliament’s lower chamber, in addition to increasing its share of the vote to a record level. Varied though the results were, there is little doubt that Fidesz and PiS will retain overall control of their respective countries.
Brave new world
Foreign investors will have to accommodate the populist nationalism and statist illiberalism for at least another half-decade, if not longer. Memories of these erstwhile disciples of liberal democracy and free market capitalism are fading fast. The blue-eyed students of post-socialism have long since become problem children of neo-capitalism.
Both countries have championed the development of domestic capital, favouring certain companies. Special taxes, unilateral contract conversions and re-nationalisation of sectors have been imposed at the expense of certain foreign multinationals in particular sectors. Checks and balances have been weakened through systematic increases in the influence of the executive over the courts and regulators. The media environment has been distorted by creeping regulatory action and buyouts by pro-government businesspeople.
Indeed, institutional quality in both countries has demonstrably deteriorated. The World Bank’s World Governance Indicators from 2017 show that since 2010 both Hungary (fig. 1.1) and Poland (fig. 1.2) have generally declining or flatlining results in several key categories, notably control of corruption, regulatory quality, rule of law and voice and accountability.
Figure 1.1 - Hungary World Governance Indicators – Source: World Bank (2017)
Figure 1.2 – Poland World Governance Indicators – Source: World Bank (2017)
Based on these trends, Hungary and Poland are turning their backs on the very assumptions that informed their transition to the prevailing Western political economic model. A textbook case of these assumptions was provided by the OECD in a key study from 2000, which argued that institutional reform, fiscal consolidation and market liberalisation are the pillars of a competition policy that can attract foreign direct investment (FDI). Establishing good governance would provide foreign investors with the peace of mind to plan ahead, even if the electoral cycle ejected a curveball.
With the logic of these conclusions, developments in Hungary and Poland should have resulted in a significant decline in FDI. Yet this has not occurred to any great extent. Both countries perform strongly in the Central, East and South Eastern Europe (CESEE) region in terms of FDI inflows and FDI inward stock as a percentage of GDP and per capita.
Hungary, despite having gone far further than Poland with respect to its illiberal restructuring, remains a darling of foreign investors. And although the FDI performance of Poland lags behind some of its regional peers, this is the result of policy decisions already made prior to the election of PiS in 2015 – by governments deemed to be ‘liberal’. Elsewhere, Serbia – a state whose already low institutional quality has also declined – has even increased in appeal for foreign investors.
Figure 2.1 – Source: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw)
Figure 2.2 – Source: wiiw
Figure 2.3 – Source: wiiw
Clearly, the decline in governance ratings and increase in populism has not lessened investor appetites, as Hungary and Poland remain prime destinations for FDI. There are three reasons as to why this might be the case.
Jekyll and Hyde: The policy flipside
Although Hungary and Poland have targeted foreign capital in recent years, the initial discomfort is largely over. Structurally, both countries continue to roll out the proverbial red carpet for foreign investors.
Hungary maintains an average effective corporate tax rate of 5%, the lowest level in the EU. Between 2010-2018, it doubled its financial support for foreign multinationals to €1bn, which similarly receive 66% of Hungary’s EU Cohesion Policy funding, the highest proportion in the EU. Hungary’s labour market has also been radically liberalised. Fidesz has nearly doubled allowable overtime hours, decentralised collective bargaining, reduced the social security burden on employers, and eased the process by which employers can dismiss workers.
Favoured companies, including foreign investors, can maintain a privileged relationship with the state through “strategic partnerships.” A system of tax-deductible donations to sports foundations – football is the burning passion of the Fidesz community – also allows for political protection to be bought.
PiS has also introduced generous incentives for FDI even while it has spoken of the “re-Polanisation” of certain sectors. The Special Economic Zone (SEZ), which offers corporate and personal income tax relief for new investments, was expanded from a regional to a nationwide basis. Companies may deduct up to 50% of investment costs from their corporate tax bill for projects that last at least five years. The Innovation Box scheme conditionally lowers tax on intellectual property to 5%, the lowest level in the developed world. Investors in underdeveloped regions are exempted from property tax.
More generally, both countries occupy geographically strategic locations in the Central European supply chain. Poland, in particular, will deepen its infrastructural connectivity with several major projects, such as the Central Communication Port (CPK), which will serve the aviation and railway sectors. Hard indicators such as these, factor into the long-term planning of foreign investors more than populist rhetoric and the creeping politicisation of independent institutions.
The straitjacket: EU membership
The membership of both Hungary and Poland of the EU acts as a major safeguard. Even where institutional deterioration has occurred, the EU has an increasing number of instruments to prevent a full descent into authoritarianism.
The European Commission has flexed its muscles, albeit hesitantly and slowly, with proceedings to trigger Article 7, which could result in the suspension of certain membership rights. The EU budget for 2021-2027 is likely to couple development funding with respect for the rule of law. The newly established European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) will target nepotism and corruption.
There are other mitigating factors. Hungary and Poland are among the largest beneficiaries of EU structural and investment funding, having received €29bn (3% of GDP) and €105bn (2% of GDP), respectively, between 2014-2020. These funds – which benefit state-favoured companies – are not easily raised from elsewhere. Membership of the single market prevents by its very nature the kind of policies that would really cause investor flight, such as restrictions on the repatriation of profits by foreign companies, while being part of the EU “regulatory union” ensures commonality. Foreign exchange policy is coordinated with the Eurozone and European Central Bank, preventing politically catalysed currency valuations similar to those seen in Turkey.
Indeed, Hungary and Poland are so intertwined with the Central European supply chain and the FDI that brings, that it is only politically logical to push the limits of the rules, rather than to break them outright. Material realities win the day: the moody teenagers know on which side their bread is buttered – they may be rebellious but leaving home is not an option.
Fair winds: The economic cycle
Despite the institutional decline in Hungary and Poland, the Fidesz and PiS governments have enjoyed an economic upswing. The global economic cycle has peaked and is slowing but has not crashed, cruising at a growth rate of 3.6% of GDP in 2018, while aggregate growth in the EU was 2%. Hungary and Poland perform above these averages, with both posting growth rates of 5%.
These rates are not synthetic, nor generated solely by EU funds and hot money: they are spread across all sectors of both economies, indicating that the macroeconomic fundamentals are robust.
Other key indicators bear this out: budget balance, current account balance and household debt levels, for example, are all within sustainable limits. In such circumstances, foreign investors are prepared to tolerate higher levels of risk, including political. Yet the cycle is perpetuated by investor confidence, and should this disappear, it might not return in the same volume.
A delicate balancing act
Hungary and Poland are unique case studies in that their respective political economies cannot be placed in the same category as the usual suspects of the “new authoritarian” world. Institutional decline has occurred, but it has been creeping, mostly remaining just within permissible limits. Risks remain low compared to the 1990s, when the pillars of good governance and the market economy were very much works in progress. There is a far higher degree of institutional predictability for foreign investors in both countries than in much of the rest of CESEE, including Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Western Balkans, Ukraine and Turkey.
Hungary and Poland also demonstrate the importance of micro political risks in determining FDI patterns. Investors are not a passive, unified collective, but a disparate mass of proactive actors with varying interests; they can form strategies to mitigate risks and seize the opportunities that arise out of them. Risk is a rocky landscape to be navigated rather than a storm to be endured. Hungary and Poland continue to offer a wide range of instruments and benefits to this end.
Foreign multinationals and state-favoured actors are thus able to coexist alongside each other, or even enter into mutually beneficial agreements – cynical though they may be. Institutional risks need not matter if a foreign investor sees an opportunity and has conducted the necessary hedging and adopted appropriate risk management strategies.
These considerations highlight how many factors would need to combine to create the kind of perfect storm capable of prompting mass disinvestment from Hungary and Poland, such as that experienced by Turkey. More likely, given the uncertain direction of the EU – what will it look like in 10 years? The question for both countries will be a long-term one and one that does not just involve a calculation at the single country level.
Marcus How is the Head of Research & Analysis at ViennEast Consulting GmbH
here to continue reading this article
and 5 more for free or purchase
12 months full website access including
the bne Magazine for just $250/year.
Register to read the bne monthly magazine for
Password could contain only
and have 8-20 symbols length.
Please complete your registration by confirming your
A confirmation email has been sent to the email
address you provided.
can't be empty.
No user with
this email address.
Access recovery request have been expired. Please,
Access recover request have been expired.
Please, try again.
To continue viewing our content you need to complete
the registration process.
Please look for an email that was sent to
with the subject line
"Confirmation bne IntelliNews access". This email will have
instructions on how to complete registration
process. Please check in your "Junk" folder in
case this communication was misdirected in your
If you have any questions please contact us at email@example.com
Sorry, but you have used all your free articles fro
this month for bne IntelliNews. Subscribe
to continue reading for only $119 per year.
Your subscription includes:
For the meantime we are also offering a free
digital weekly newspaper to subscribers to
the online package.
Click here for more subscription options,
including to the print version of our
flagship monthly magazine:
Take a trial to our premium daily news
service aimed at professional investors that
covers the 30 countries of emerging
For any other enquiries about our
products or corporate discounts please
contact us at
If you no longer wish to receive
Magazine annual print
Website & Archive
Combined package: web
access & magazine print
Take a trial to our premium daily news service
aimed at professional investors that
covers the 30 countries of emerging Europe: