Western Balkans citizens legally resident in EU equal to 14% of region’s population
International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) has stripped Belarus of the right to hold the World Championship this year
Alexei Navalny arrested on arrival as he returns home
LONG READ: The oligarch problem
Russia's National Welfare Fund accounts for almost 12% of GDP
Police arresting activists ahead of Saturday’s demonstration in support of Navalny
Biden seeking a five-year extension to START II missile treaty
Russian consumer confidence index drops q/q, y/y in 4Q20
Western Balkans and Ukraine urged to scrutinise coal subsidies
Oligarchs trying to derail Ukraine’s privatisation programme, warns the head of Ukraine’s State Property Fund
Private finance mobilised by development banks up 9% to $175bn in 2019
VISEGRAD BLOG: Central Europe's populists need a new strategy for Biden
OUTLOOK 2021 Lithuania
EBRD says loan to Estonia’s controversial Porto Franco project was never disbursed
Czech MPs pass protectionist food law in violation of EU rules
M&A in Central and Eastern Europe fell 16% in value in 2020, says CMS report
Hungarian vehicle makers hit by supply chain shortage
COVID-19 and Trump’s indifference helped human rights abusers in 2020
OUTLOOK 2021 Poland
OUTLOOK 2021 Slovakia
BRICKS & MORTAR: Rosier future beckons for CEE retailers after year of change and disruption
FDI inflows to CEE down 58% in 1H20 but rebound expected
Albania needs reforms for e-commerce to thrive, says World Bank
BALKAN BLOG: US approach to switch from quick-fix dealmaking to experience and cooperation
Corona-induced slump in global clothing sector dragged down Albania’s 2020 exports
Bosnia's exports in 2020 amounted to BAM10.5bn, trade deficit to BAM6.3bn
Bulgaria's Biodit first company to IPO on new BEAM market
Bulgaria’s government considers gradual easing of COVID-related restrictions
Sofia-based LAUNCHub Ventures holds first close of new fund on €44mn
Spring lockdown caused spike in online transactions in Croatia
ING: Growth in the Balkans: from zero to hero again?
Labour demand down 28% y/y in Croatia in 2020
EBRD investments reach record €11bn in pandemic-struck 2020
OUTLOOK 2021 Moldova
Storming parliaments: New Europe's greatest hits
World Bank revises projection for Moldova’s 2020 GDP decline to 7.2%
Montenegrins say state administration is most corrupt institution
North Macedonia plans to cut personal income tax in IT sector to zero in 2023
Romania government to pursue “ambitious” timetable for justice reforms
OUTLOOK 2021 Romania
OUTLOOK 2021 Slovenia
Slovenia’s opposition files no-confidence motion against Jansa cabinet
Slovenia’s government to release funds to news agency STA after EU pressure
UK Moneyhub picks Slovenia for post-Brexit European base
D’S Damat franchise deals ‘show Turkey’s hard-pressed mall operators becoming their own tenants’
Turkey’s benchmark rate held as concerns over faltering recovery come to fore
Turkish lira breaches HSBC’s stop-loss, Turkey ETF signalling outflows
CAUCASUS BLOG : What can Biden offer the Caucasus and Stans, all but forgotten about by Trump?
Armenia ‘to extend life of its 1970s Metsamor nuclear power plant after 2026’
OUTLOOK 2021 Armenia
COMMENT: Record high debt levels will slow post-coronavirus recovery, threaten some countries' financial stability, says IIF
OUTLOOK 2021 Georgia
Iran’s Khamenei menaces private citizen Trump with image of aircraft shadowing blond golfer
Iran’s technology minister indicted for failing to properly implement internet censorship
No US move to rejoin Iran nuclear deal imminent, say Biden national security nominees
TEHRAN BLOG: Will Biden bet on a quick return to the Iran nuclear deal?
Central Asia vaccination plans underwhelm, but governments look unruffled
Fears of authoritarianism as Kyrgyz populist wins landslide and backing for ‘Khanstitution’
Mongolia's PM quits amid protests over treatment of mother with coronavirus and newborn baby
Mongolia's winter dzud set to be one of most extreme on record says Red Cross
Mongolian coal exports to China paralysed as Beijing demands virus testing of truck drivers
Mongolia fears economic damage as country faces up to its first local transmissions of coronavirus
OUTLOOK 2021 Tajikistan
OUTLOOK 2021 Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan: How the Grinch stole New Year
COMMENT: Uzbekistan is being transformed, but where are the democratic reforms?
Download the pdf version
More...
On July 1, 2020, Romania was supposed to remember that 15 years ago its currency was re-denominated by cutting four zeros from its previous denomination. One new leu (known also as RON, or “leul greu” — “heavy leu”) replaced the old leu (also known as ROL) in a quasi-monetary reform. However, the event passed conspicuously unobserved. The mass media from the country was also very anaemic in marking such an event. It was very clear that exchanging 10,000 ROL for 1 RON was not an event to be celebrated either by the National Bank of Romania (BNR) or by the Romanians themselves, as it signified the loss of purchasing power of a currency of a country in transition to a market economy. Despite all this perception, the actions taken by the BNR were adequate at the time and had lasting economic and emotional consequences for the entire population and for domestic and international markets.
Early start of transition
After many years of artificial exchange rates and in the aftermath of the December 1989 events, the new authorities introduced very bold measures regarding the foreign exchange regime aiming for the leu’s convertibility. First of all, the very restrictive foreign exchange regime was relaxed during the last days of 1989. The restrictions regarding the holding of foreign currencies were abolished during the December 1989 revolution. Also, on February 1, 1990, the commercial and non-commercial exchange rates were unified at ROL21.00 to the US dollar (from ROL8.74/USD for the non-commercial exchange rate and ROL14.23/USD for the commercial one, as historically recorded as of end-January 1990). Nevertheless, the level of ROL21.00/USD was not the equilibrium exchange rate for the leu. It started then a very long and tumultuous road to find its equilibrium level and to avoid parallel exchange rates which were a defining features of the currency during the last decade of the socialist era. Those dramatic evolutions of the leu were a clear reflection of the sharp economic decline registered by the economy after 1989 and of a spiralling inflation-depreciation cycle.
Moreover, during this period, the leu’s exchange rate was frequently “frozen” or, in more precise terms, it was “manipulated”. The leu was over-appreciating in real terms and the gap between the nominal exchange rate and the effective one started to widen. The trust of the population in the leu sharply declined. The run after US dollars had already started. The “dollarisation” of the economy became a common and almost continuous feature. Looking back, this could be considered one of the most difficult periods in the leu’s history. Its dramatic evolution up to re-denomination in July 2005 is best illustrated if the end-1989 exchange rate of ROL14.44/USD is compared with ROL29,100/USD as of end-2004. Romania was not alone in such exercises of re-denomination and Ukraine is another eloquent example in the region. In all cases, the evolution and actions diminished the trust of the population and of the international markets in the respective currency. The leu’s case followed the script.
The July 2005 re-denomination
The level the leu’s exchange rate reached in the first years of the 21st century was not sustainable from many points of view. Accounting systems were clogged with very large numbers (almost impossible to administer with the IT technology available in those days), the cash in circulation was very difficult to handle and, more importantly, the trust of the population in a weaker and weaker leu (printed in banknotes with larger and larger denominations — up to 1,000,000 leu) was running out. Under such circumstances, on July 1, 2005, the NBR took the right decision to re-denominate the old Romanian leu (see below in Fig. 1) and to print a new currency, the new Romanian leu, in what was called by historians a new monetary reform (10,000 old lei were changed for one new leu). The newly denominated leu is also presented in Fig. 1 below. A monetary stabilisation was not the intention of the Romanian authorities as there were no restrictions (like in 1947 and 1949) on the amount of old currency allowed to be changed against the new one. In fact, the old currency was still in circulation in parallel and permission was given to change it against the new currency during a period of six months. Domestic prices were double labelled in both ROL and RON up to end-June 2006.
Fig. 1: The old and the new Romanian leu introduced on July 1, 2005. Source: NBR website/Numismatics.
It is fair to say that the BNR's action facilitated very much the Romanian accounting system and the relevant statistics, but from a cultural point of view, in many places (especially in the flea markets), Romanians still speak about prices denominated in ROL 15 years later. This very confusing situation (especially for tourists, mainly foreigners) just demonstrates the material and emotional bearing of a currency (the leu in this case) on the population’s way of thinking and behaving. Over the last 15 years, the leu has continued to fluctuate in a moderate way and to follow what could easily be called the tumultuous evolution of the Romanian economy. On top of this, the severe international banking crisis of October 2008 left a heavy mark on the leu. The pandemic of 2020 will have no doubt yet another negative impact on its evolution. The graph below is a simple illustration of this evolution to early July 2020 when the leu was quoted by the BNR at RON4.8365/EUR and RON4.2843/USD. And, most likely, the story is not over.
Source: Compiled based on data published by the BNR (Interactive Data Base); end of period
Discussions on replacing the leu
During the last few years, the Romanian authorities launched public discussions about adopting the euro as the country’s currency and joining the euro zone. These discussions were led by politicians rather than by the BNR which should lead this great project. Later on a working group was created under the auspices of the BNR which was expected to submit well documented proposals to the government and subsequently to the parliament. All have been put on hold due to the pandemic which hit Romania starting with January 2020. The fundamental question was and still is if Romania is well prepared for such a huge step. The answer is yet to be given, but a quick review of some key macro-economic indicators is worthwhile.
First of all, Romania registered large budgetary deficits during 2019 (the largest in the EU at 4.64% of GDP) and the prospects for 2020 are not favourable either (some analysts even predict a large deficit of 9-10% of GDP). The increase of the pensions for 5.1mn retired Romanians in September 2020 and of the child allowances will indeed put additional pressure on the state budget. Second, Romania has had and most likely will continue to have large trade and current account deficits. Its foreign debt increased during the last 10 years for which the data from the NBR is available from €90bn as of June 2010 to €107.9bn as of end-March 2020. Third, the Romanian inflation will most likely jump as the launching of the economic recovery is quite slow and hesitant (due to COVID-19 reasons that are well understood). Fourth, the country’s international reserves (without gold) have shown a decreasing tendency lately. The total volume of reserves (including gold) were helped a little bit (plus €1bn in June 2020 as compared to July 2019 for the same gold holdings) by the predictable increase of gold prices during the pandemic crisis, as this is now considered a safe heaven by all states and/or investors. Last but not least, the Romanian economy will contract this year according to the IMF’s and the World Bank's most updated projects (-5.8% in 2020 according to the IMF World Economic Outlook Update - June 2020 for all Emerging and Developing Europe, a group of countries in which Romania is included).
Under such circumstances, the Romanian authorities should focus on how to deal with the re-launching of the economy in parallel with the well-grounded relaxation of the stringent measures imposed, like in many other states, during the great lockdown. Also, key priority should be given to investments in infrastructure projects for which European Union financing is possible. An allocation of €33bn (of which €19.6bn as grants and the rest as loans) was preliminarily designated for Romania, out of the €750bn Recovery Fund against the negative impact of COVID-19). Full absorption of these funds will not only be needed for the welfare of the whole society, but will also have a positive impact on the answer to the question of acceding to the euro zone as and when feasible and opportune. Domestically, a set a key measures should be implemented as well before the answer to the question is given. A well-documented professional proposal is required from the NBR before any political decision.
Alexandru M. Tanase is an independent consultant and former associate director, senior banker at the EBRD and former IMF advisor. These are personal views of the author. The assessments and views expressed are not those of the EBRD and/or of the IMF and/or of the BNR. The assessment and data are based on information as of mid-June 2020.
Register here to continue reading this article and 5 more for free or purchase 12 months full website access including the bne Magazine for just $250/year.
Register to read the bne monthly magazine for free:
Already registered
Password could contain only a-z0-9\+*?[^]$(){}=!<>|:-_ characters and have 8-20 symbols length.
Please complete your registration by confirming your email address.
A confirmation email has been sent to the email address you provided.
Forgotten password?
Email field can't be empty.
No user with this email address.
Access recovery request has expired, or you are using the wrong recovery token. Please, try again.
Access recover request has expired. Please, try again.
To continue viewing our content you need to complete the registration process.
Please look for an email that was sent to with the subject line "Confirmation bne IntelliNews access". This email will have instructions on how to complete registration process. Please check in your "Junk" folder in case this communication was misdirected in your email system.
If you have any questions please contact us at sales@intellinews.com
Sorry, but you have used all your free articles fro this month for bne IntelliNews. Subscribe to continue reading for only $119 per year.
Your subscription includes:
For the meantime we are also offering a free subscription to bne's digital weekly newspaper to subscribers to the online package.
Click here for more subscription options, including to the print version of our flagship monthly magazine:
More subscription options
Take a trial to our premium daily news service aimed at professional investors that covers the 30 countries of emerging Europe:
Get IntelliNews PRO
For any other enquiries about our products or corporate discounts please contact us at sales@intellinews.com
If you no longer wish to receive our emails, unsubscribe here.
Magazine annual electronic subscription
Magazine annual print subscription
Website & Archive annual subscription
Combined package: web access & magazine print annual subscription